Twofer Tuesday ~ One Day Late
~ Daniel Kmiecik
If you guessed secret answer ‘C’, Both, you’re correct. Above are the photos used to create the two HDR photos in my post “Thoughtful Thursday ~ HDR or Not?”. How can both be HDR? The answer is in the purpose of HDR and how it’s used.
The dynamic range of a camera, or more correctly a specific camera system/setup, in practice, is the number of stops in which the system is capable of resolving detail from dark to light. Film has generally been considered to have a dynamic range of 5 stops. Digital cameras can vary from 5 stops and depending on who you talk to and how much math you want to get into, they can can be about 6-8 stops. The human eye can see more than 20 stops.
Ok, now in English.
If those two exposures are more than 5 stops apart there is a good chance you will not have detail in both the darkest and the lightest areas of the photo.
Example:
HDR allows you to increase that 5 stop range by any amount you want. The technique is pretty simple really. Mounting your camera on tripod makes things easy, but with today’s software it’s not completely necessary. (I did not use one with these photos.)
However you decide to hold the camera, the next step is to take at least two photos of the same subject (more is better because you have more control over the final results), one set to expose for the darkest parts of the scene and the other to expose for the lightest parts. When I say to “expose for”, that does not mean you use the meter readings you just took. Don’t forget, all light meters will meter for “middle gray”. So, when you expose for the dark area you want to increase your exposure. For your light areas, you want to decrease the exposure. Since you’re going to use an HDR technique, you can increase your exposure by whatever it takes to get the amount of detail you want in the dark areas and decrease the exposure as much as necessary to get the detail you want in the light areas. The next step is to combine the photos so the result shows details in the dark and the light.
For “Demolished Buidling_01” I used a trial version of software that had a lot of wizards and controls etc. Specialized HDR software gets used quite a bit and is the reason we see so many of these “grittier” or “cartoony” versions of HDR photos. It makes it very easy to create this type of artwork using something called “tone mapping”. I will not even attempt to get into that one.
For “Demolished Building_02” I used Photoshop, but I did not use the built-in HDR function. I wanted a more realistic look to the final photo, something more like the human eye sees without even thinking about it. I added the photos into one file, each on a its own layer. It took a lot of work with masks, brushes and blending modes, but I got the result I wanted. I had actually done this version before trying HDR software, which is why I tried HDR software. While exploring the trial software I was able to create an HDR version that was indistinguishable from the version I made in Photoshop. The process with the trial software took about 5 minutes. I don’t use Photoshop for HDR any more.
I’m hoping I haven’t been too vague on the explanation of all this. If you have any questions, please post a comment so others can see your questions and my answers.
~ Daniel Kmiecik
Critiquing (anything these days) has become all to negative for me. I don’t mind anyone, everyone in fact, having their own opinion about anything at all. There is no such thing as a wrong opinion; you believe what you believe for the reasons that are uniquely your own. What does bug the hell out of me is people believing “to critique” means to “find fault with”. Yes, I know, several dictionaries will tell you this is true, but it’s not the definition I choose to use. You’ll hear critique used this way on all the performance reality shows and you’ll see it used this way in most, if not all, of the online photo clubs. Movie critics do it, art critics do it. It needs to stop.
I’m not sure why this happened, but as you’ll see below in the etymology of the word “critic” this is not its original meaning. So I’m taking back the word critic and its verb, critique.
Etymology of the word critic:
critic (n.)
In short you don’t have to find fault with what you critique. A critique can be an assessment of everything that is good about a work. Next time you’re asked to critique something, remember this post and find everything you can that is good in what you are critiquing. Nobody wants to hear everything that is bad about their work. They probably do that enough on their own. Also, don’t think you have to have years of experience in order to critique someone’s work. Your opinion matters to them as much as the next person’s. Let them know what you like about the work. If you truly can find nothing you like, you can choose to not critique it. No one will ever know.
~ Daniel Kmiecik
Without
After many failed attempts I finally came up with a simple way to make sure your sensor or film plane is perfectly parallel to the slab without using a level and making painstaking adjustments. You will need a tripod with a center column that allows you to move your camera up and down.
Here are the steps:
If you’ve ever tried to set something like this up with a level you know how difficult it can be to keep everything parallel. This seems like a lot of work when you read it, but when you do it once you’ll see it really is very fast and easy.
~ Daniel Kmiecik
Photo Tip:
Both photos were created with the same single 150ws light from Interfit Lighting, and using a Photoflex 36 x 48 inch softbox.
Remember, the larger the light is compared to the subject, the softer the shadow will be. Placing the softbox practically on top of the pizza made the light very large as compared to the pizza itself (it was a small pizza, 8″ I think). Placing the softbox further away from the onion made the light smaller compared to being right next to it (things get smaller as they move away from you).
Think of it like this, the Sun is an enormous light source. However, on a bright sunny, cloudless day, your shadow on the ground is very well defined. That’s because even though the Sun is huge, it’s practically a pin light in the sky. Conversely, on a bright cloudy day, one where can’t quite make out where the is in the sky, your shadow has very soft edges, if you can see it at all. The clouds are acting as a giant softbox. Knowing this can help you with how you light your subject the way you want to see it.
~ Daniel Kmiecik